FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

News and Sport

FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby Ealing » Thu May 22, 2008 8:58 am

Ealing wrote:In spite of strict secrecy laws governing my source he* feels there will be penalties for all parties at the end of the event.

The numbers 23 and 89 will prove important and a young portuguese lad will be prominent.

I can say no further without divulging more.

*Gender hidden to protect my source. She is very cautious.
PREDICTED BEFORE THE EVENT

Last night I think you will find a goal scored on 26 minutes, almost perfect, there were indeed penalties at the end of an event and if missing a penalty and scoring a goal during regular play by Ronaldo (young portuguese lad) is not prominent then my names not Marmaduke.

If you are going to quote from a source, at least make sure they know what they are talking about.

I rest my case.
Last edited by Ealing on Thu May 22, 2008 9:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ealing
New In Town
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:07 pm

Re: FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby Ealing » Thu May 22, 2008 8:59 am

:)
Ealing
New In Town
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:07 pm

Re: FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby margaret » Thu May 22, 2008 10:04 am

So last nights game was a FIX :shock: :lol:
A little light relief: Mary had a little lamb, she tied it to a pylon, 10,000 volts shot up its bum and turned its wool to nylon.
User avatar
margaret
Local Lag
 
Posts: 837
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: 'The Pink Crusader'

Re: FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby Hunger4Unger » Thu May 22, 2008 10:05 am

Eplain how 89 factored in?

Also this isnt having sources its guess work.
No one could have facts or evidence to provide information regarding this match as it hadn't taken place yet, unlike insight and evidence provided by others who have sources related to the McCann case.
Hunger4Unger
You're Nicked
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: Hull, England

Re: FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby coral » Thu May 22, 2008 12:21 pm

Hunger4Unger wrote:Eplain how 89 factored in?

Also this isnt having sources its guess work.
No one could have facts or evidence to provide information regarding this match as it hadn't taken place yet, unlike insight and evidence provided by others who have sources related to the McCann case.


Yes I was wondering what the all seeing oracle would say about 89, nothing happened at the 89th minute :wink: :roll:
coral
Local Lag
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: FAO COLDWATER & ANY OTHER SAUCIER

Postby Ealing » Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 pm

coral wrote:
Hunger4Unger wrote:Eplain how 89 factored in?

Also this isnt having sources its guess work.
No one could have facts or evidence to provide information regarding this match as it hadn't taken place yet, unlike insight and evidence provided by others who have sources related to the McCann case.


Yes I was wondering what the all seeing oracle would say about 89, nothing happened at the 89th minute :wink: :roll:


75% success rate, Coldwater's is 0.75% :)
Ealing
New In Town
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:07 pm


Return to News and Sport

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
cron